The Rhetorical Approach in the Federalist Papers No.10, No.54, No.84 and No.85

Zusatztext

Seminar paper from the year 2008 in the subject American Studies - Literature, grade: 1,7, RWTH Aachen University, course: American Non-Fiction, language: English, abstract: The eighty-five essays, today commonly referred to as The Federalist Papers,were written in 1787 and 1788 in order to help in securing the ratification of theproposed United States Constitution in the State of New York. Although the essayswere all signed Publius, they were written by three men of different background and,to some extent, different political ideas. John Jay, Alexander Hamilton and JamesMadison have contributed to the Papers in different quantity. Due to an illness Jayhas contributed only five articles. Hamiltons and Madisons contributions are notalways easy to separate but most scholars ascribe twenty-nine articles to Madisonand fifty-one to Hamilton. The authorship of essays 18-20, 49-58, and 62-63 wasthe subject of heated historical controversy for more than a century and a half,because both Hamilton and Madison allegedly claimed authorship of these essays.The object of this paper is to analyze the rhetorical approach of Madison andHamilton in selected papers. Also, an attempt will be made to determine if, and towhat extent their rhetorical style and political ideas are distinguishable even underthe joint guise of Publius.The analysis will be undertaken on the examples of four selected papers No. 10,54, 84 and 85, which were chosen as representatives of the respective authors style,since a detailed analysis of all 85 papers would be to extensive for a term paper.Contributions by John Jay are deliberately left out since they consist of only 5 paperswhich are arguably among the less important ones. Federalist No.10 was chosen as the most famous of Madisons contributions due toits prominence within the scholarly debate and the prevailing significance of theproblem discussed in the essay the dangers or factions within a republic system.No. 54 was chosen as an example of disputed authorship and due to its treatment ofthe complex problem of slavery in regard to the number of Representatives of Southern States. A special interest lies in the authors approach to distinguish theslaves status of being people and property at the same time. No. 84 was chosendue to Hamiltons interesting rhetorical treatment of and political stance on the bill ofrights. No. 85 was chosen because of its importance as a conclusion to the completework and arguments of the whole body of texts. [...]

Weitere Details