The Idealism-Realism Debate Among Edmund Husserl's Early Followers and Critics

Zusatztext

<p>This volume aims to contextualize the development and reception of Husserls transcendental-phenomenological idealism by placing him in dialogue with his most important interlocutors his mentors, peers, and students. Husserls turn to idealism and the ensuing reaction to<i> Ideas I</i> resulted in a schism between the early members of the phenomenological movement. The division between the realist and the transcendental phenomenologists is often portrayed as a sharp one, with the realists naively and dogmatically rejecting all of Husserls written work after the<i>Logical Investigations</i>. However, this understanding of the trajectory of the phenomenological movement ignores the extensive and intricate contours of the idealism-realism debate. In addition to helping us better interpret Husserls attempts to defend his idealism, reconsidering the idealism-realism debate elucidates the relationship and differences between Husserl's phenomenology and the broader landscape of early 20th century German philosophy, particularly the Munich phenomenologists and the Neo-Kantians. The contributions to this volume reconsider many of the early interpretations and critiques of Husserl, inviting readers to assess the merits of the arguments put forward by his critics while also shedding new light on their so-called misunderstandings of his idealism. This text should be of interest to researchers working in the history of phenomenology and Husserlian studies.<br></p><p></p><p></p>

Autorenportrait

<p><b>Rodney K. B. Parker</b> is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Dominican University College in Ottawa, Canada. He has previously held positions at the Universität Paderborn and the University of Western Ontario. He received his PhD in 2013 with his dissertation <i>Husserl¿s Transcendental Idealism and the Problem of Solipsism</i>. Since then, he has published numerous translations and articles on the history of the phenomenological movement. He is also the co-editor of <i>The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 16: Phenomenology of Emotions. Systematical and Historical Perspectives</i> (2018) and <i>Studia Phaenomenologica 15: Early Phenomenology</i> (2015).</p>

Weitere Details